Download uglyz

Tracklist Sorted by: Running order Running order Most popular. Buy Loading. More Love this track. Play album Buy Loading. Scrobble Stats?

What is scrobbling? Artist images 1 more. Andazification is trying to galvanize a cultural evolution and awareness to modern Nepali music by distillingcreative energy and colloquial language and filtering it into the Nepali music scene.

Each member had a different musical upbringing that has morphed this album into a multi-facet of genres ranging form pop rock to hip-hop! The debut album JPT an acronym for "Jei pai tei" meaning "whatever" in Nepal is a stab at their generation and the attitudes that are perme… read more. Andazification is trying to galvanize a cultural evolution and awareness to modern Nepali musi… read more. Andazification is trying to galvanize a cultural evolution and awareness to modern Nepali music by distillingcreative energy and colloquial … read more.

Similar Artists Play all. Trending Tracks 1. Love this track. More Love this track Set track as current obsession Get track Loading.

Play track. Thursday 15 July Friday 16 July Saturday 17 July Sunday 18 July Monday 19 July Tuesday 20 July Wednesday 21 July Thursday 22 July Friday 23 July Saturday 24 July Sunday 25 July Monday 26 July Tuesday 27 July Wednesday 28 July Thursday 29 July Friday 30 July Saturday 31 July Sunday 1 August Monday 2 August Tuesday 3 August Wednesday 4 August Thursday 5 August Friday 6 August Saturday 7 August Sunday 8 August Monday 9 August Tuesday 10 August Wednesday 11 August Thursday 12 August Friday 13 August Saturday 14 August Sunday 15 August Monday 16 August Tuesday 17 August Wednesday 18 August Thursday 19 August Friday 20 August Saturday 21 August On Amazon, you might see your friends' reviews.

On YouTube, you might see what your friends watched or see their comments first. Those reviews and comments will be meaningful because you know who wrote them and what your relationship to those authors is.

They have a social context. Not that long ago, a post-Google Web was unimaginable, but if there is one, this is what it will look like: a Web reorganized around people. If the three people closest to you like y, you want to see y. Now take it off the Web. Put it on TV. Imagine a slate of shows sorted by which of your friends likes them, instead of by network. Now put it on your phone. Take it mobile. The clarification is vintage Zuckerberg.

It's like you go to a restaurant and you bump into a friend that you haven't seen for a while. That's awesome. That's serendipitous. And a lot of the reason why that seems so magical is because it doesn't happen often. But I think the reality is that those circumstances aren't actually rare. How much of the time do you think you're actually at the same restaurant as that person but you're at opposite sides so you don't see them, or you missed each other by 10 minutes, or they're in the next restaurant over?

Facebook wants to populate the wilderness, tame the howling mob and turn the lonely, antisocial world of random chance into a friendly world, a serendipitous world. You'll be working and living inside a network of people, and you'll never have to be alone again. The Internet, and the whole world, will feel more like a family, or a college dorm, or an office where your co-workers are also your best friends. Facebook occupies two Palo Alto office buildings that are a few minutes apart.

On the outside, they're brutalist concrete bunkers. On the inside, they're decorated in a quirky, postindustrial Silicon Valley style you might call Flourishing Start-Up Chic — high ceilings, concrete floors, steel beams, lots of windows.

There's a giant chessboard, and the word hack has been doodled and graffitied everywhere. The halls are littered with RipStiks, those two-wheeled skateboards that you move by wiggling, which Zuckerberg doesn't ride. He tried once and fell off; that was enough. Silicon Valley companies squabble incessantly and viciously over personnel. Employees change hands like poker chips, and right now Facebook has the best hand at the table. Everyone at Facebook was a star somewhere else: Taylor, for example, led the team that created — maybe you've heard of it?

You don't get a lot of shy, retiring types at Facebook. These are the kinds of power nerds to whom the movies don't do justice: fast-talking, user-friendly, laser-focused and radiating the kind of confidence that gives you a sunburn. Sorkin did a much better job of representing Facebook when he wrote The West Wing.

Facebook employees get treated well — three free, good meals a day; unlimited snacks; free dry cleaning — but make no mistake: the main attraction is Zuckerberg's vision. All the key engineers tell the same conversion story.

I'm working on a serious problem. Facebook is a complete waste of time," says Chris Cox, Facebook's vice president of product, who was doing a master's in artificial intelligence at Stanford at the time.

I saw the vision. I came in, and I saw it on a whiteboard. The company is on its seventh headquarters in almost as many years. It keeps outgrowing its offices, and pretty soon it will outgrow these. Zuckerberg is scouting for a Microsoft-style campus for Facebook.

This is because, in addition to adding a lot of users, Facebook is starting to make a lot of money. The users are Zuckerberg's contribution, but the money is largely attributable to Sheryl Sandberg. Coiffed, elegant and terrifyingly smart, Sandberg, 41, arrived at Facebook in early Before that, she ran Google's ad business, and before that, she was Lawrence Summers' chief of staff at the Treasury Department.

She spent her time talking to Bono about curing leprosy. Now she is the first meeting Zuckerberg takes on Monday morning and the last on Friday afternoon. And I always wanted to work in places that felt like they were going to have an impact on the world. For all its technological, social and philosophical complexity, Facebook has only one major source of revenue: advertising. Before Sandberg arrived, Zuckerberg grew that part of the business slowly. He refused to sell banner ads.

He felt that overly obtrusive ads would compromise the personal feel of the site, so he confined them to little rectangles on one side of the page. Facebook still doesn't sell banner ads.

But Sandberg has been able to attract a roster of A-list advertisers, such as Nike, Vitaminwater and Louis Vuitton, by pointing out things they hadn't noticed about Facebook, like how much it knows about its users. Google can serve ads to you on the basis of educated guesses about who you are and what you're interested in, which are based in turn on your search history.

Facebook doesn't have to guess. It knows exactly who you are and what you're interested in, because you told it. So if Nike wants its ads shown only to people ages 19 to 26 who live in Arizona and like Nickelback, Facebook can make that happen. In the world of targeted advertising, Facebook has a high-powered sniper rifle. It also has social. Facebook users have the option, should they choose to exercise it, to "like" certain advertisements. When you anoint an ad in this fashion, it moves out of its assigned place at the edge of the page and into your News Feed and therefore into the News Feeds of your friends.

Suddenly the advertisement has a social context. It is presented to your friends, by you, carrying your personal endorsement. For marketers, this is a holy grail. Facebook has a dual identity, as both a for-profit business and a medium for our personal lives, and those two identities don't always sit comfortably side by side.

Looked at one way, when a friend likes a product, it's just more sharing, more data changing hands. Looked at another way, it's your personal relationships being monetized by a third party. People have to decide for themselves which way is their way. If "liking" an ad the same way you "like" a news article or a photo of your spouse seems creepy to you — it's more or less the definition of what Marx called commodity fetishism — you don't have to do it. Like everything on Facebook — like Facebook itself — it's voluntary.

But plenty of people are willing, even eager, to make their social lives part of an advertising pageant staged by a major corporation. When Nike put up an ad last year during the World Cup, 6 million people clicked on it.

Facebook is a privately held company and doesn't release financial statements, but Sandberg sounds confident. Facebook is the way it is because of who Zuckerberg is. The color scheme is blue and white because Zuckerberg is red-green color-blind: there are a lot of colors he can't see, but blue he can see.

Likewise, Zuckerberg has a metaphoric vision, a big-picture vision, for Facebook. And as with his literal vision, there are a few things he has trouble seeing.

Take, for example, privacy. There's a school of thought that goes something like, Mark Zuckerberg is a scheming profiteer who uses his control of Facebook to force people to share more and more of their personal lives publicly, sucking up their innermost thoughts like some kind of privacy vampire so he can feed their data to advertisers and increase traffic to his network, thereby adding to his massive personal fortune.

This is a red herring. Cynicism and greed are not character traits that appear in Zuckerberg's feature set. Facebook doesn't sell your data to advertisers. It uses the aggregated statistics of its millions of users to more effectively target the ads it serves, but that's a long way from the same thing.

And he doesn't force anybody to share anything. The idea would genuinely, honestly horrify him. But he does have a blind spot when it comes to personal privacy, which is why that issue keeps coming up. It came up in November when Facebook launched Beacon, an advertising system that told your friends about your buying habits.

You could turn off the alerts, but it was tricky, and as a result, people lost control of their information. Girlfriends found out about surprise engagement rings. Family members found out about Christmas presents.

You didn't have to be a computer genius to see that coming; in fact you pretty much had to be one to not see it coming. Users hated Beacon. A month after it launched, Zuckerberg apologized, and he eventually scrapped it. Incredibly, the same thing happened all over again in , when Facebook rolled out a complicated new set of privacy controls.

Again, users saw their information going places they didn't want it to go. Again they revolted. Zuckerberg has a talent for understanding how people work, but one urge, the urge to conceal, seems to be foreign to him. Sometimes Facebook makes it harder than it should be. It is biased in favor of sharing.

That is, after all, what Facebook is for. More transparency, being able to share things and have a voice in the world. And connected is helping people stay in touch and maintain empathy for each other, and bandwidth. Empathy and bandwidth — you could inscribe the words on Zuckerberg's coat of arms.

And they are without a doubt both good things. But are they good for everybody all the time? Sometimes Zuckerberg can sound like a wheedling spokesman for the secret police of some future totalitarian state. Why wouldn't you want to share?

Why wouldn't you want to be open — unless you've got something to hide? This is a popular attitude among the Silicon Valley elite, summed up by a remark Google CEO Eric Schmidt made last year on CNBC: "If you have something that you don't want anyone to know, maybe you shouldn't be doing it in the first place. Zuckerberg will defend privacy to the death — and he relies on a fair amount of it himself — but there's still a level on which, for him and for a lot of other people driving the Web's evolution, it's a technical, economic and aesthetic inconvenience.

Exchanging information at less than full power is just inefficient. Zuckerberg doesn't register on any particular political seismometer — hours after meeting the director of the FBI, he had to be reminded of Mueller's name — but he does remark about WikiLeaks that "technology usually wins with these things. But what makes life complicated in the postmodern technocratic aquarium we're collectively building is that there actually are good reasons to want to hide things.

Just because you present a different face to your co-workers and your family doesn't mean you're leading a double life. Thanks cool keta. Please log in to subscribe to Highlander's postings. Hello, Chha bhane "Phool ko aankha ma Phoolai sansar, kaanda ko aankha ma kaandai sansar bhanne"" post gare jaati hunthyo.

Agrim dhanybaad hai. Thanks dude, I love this song! Hey guys, Hope ya'll had fun downloadin' song and listinin' them.. Time to get off de boat; bak to Nepal.. Oh I will survive One love for the city streets One love for the hip hop beats One love oh I do believe One love in all we need Baby just love me love love me Babyu just hold me hold me hold me Oooh love me love me love me Oh yeah One love Baby just love me love me love me love me Baby just hold me hold me hold me Oooh love me love me love me One love for the mothers pride One love for the times we cried One love gotta stay alive Oh I will survive One love for the city streets One love for the hip hop beats One love oh I do believe One love in all we need One love for the mothers pride One love for the times we cried One love gotta stay alive Let's pray for peace in Nepal..

Peace out.. Dada Giri. Please log in to subscribe to Dada Giri's postings. Foe Bro! Have a nice trip. Pilen ma sangai chwank KT paros. Majaale gaf saf garne mauka milos, tyati matra kaha ho ra, Lop nai paros, Bhanchhu ma ta, Lau ja!!! E-mail address magna nabirsinu ni maile jastai feri birsera ani pachhuto matra hola jindagi bhari pachhutaaundai basdai Ani Putali Bazzar ko sabailaai mero samjhana sunaaidinu.

Images Donate icon An illustration of a heart shape Donate Ellipses icon An illustration of text ellipses. EMBED for wordpress. Want more? Advanced embedding details, examples, and help! Episode 1: Beat the Monkey.